Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (MSK) Vs Kinesis Data Streams (KDS) - Overview.
Scope:
- Concept,
- Benefits of using Amazon MSK,
- Core Components,
- Security in MSK,
- Data Flow in MSK,
- Operational Deep Dive,
- Example Use Cases,
- Best Practices,
- Kinesis Data Streams vs. Amazon MSK
The Concept:
Amazon MSK
- Amazon MSK is a fully managed Apache Kafka service which makes it easy to build and run applications that use Apache Kafka to process real-time streaming data.
- AWS manages the infrastructure, scaling, patching, monitoring, and high
availability of Kafka clusters, while twtech focuses on producing and
consuming streaming data.
Benefits of using
Amazon MSK
- No operational burden: AWS provisions and manages Kafka brokers & Zookeeper.
- Secure by default: IAM integration, VPC networking, encryption in-transit/at-rest.
- Highly available: Multi-AZ replication, self-healing infrastructure.
- Seamless integrations: Works with AWS analytics (Kinesis, Flink, Lambda, Glue, Redshift) and third-party Kafka clients.
- Cost-efficient: Pay-as-you-go, scaling based on throughput and storage needs.
Core
Components
1. Producers
- Applications/services that publish events (logs, IoT data, financial transactions, etc.) into Kafka topics.
- Communicate with brokers via the Kafka protocol or IAM-authenticated TLS.
2. Amazon MSK Cluster
- Brokers: Handle partitions, replication, and message durability.
- ZooKeeper (or KRaft in newer Kafka versions): Manages cluster metadata, leader election, configs.
- Storage: Backed by Amazon EBS volumes (durable, elastic).
- Scaling: Scale by adding brokers or adjusting storage.
3. Consumers
- Applications or services that subscribe to topics (e.g., fraud detection, stream processing).
- Process data using consumer groups for parallelism.
4. Integrations
- Producers/Sources: AWS IoT Core, CloudWatch Logs, custom apps.
- Stream Processing: Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink, AWS Lambda, Kinesis Data Firehose, EMR Spark Streaming.
- Data Lakes/Analytics: S3, Redshift, OpenSearch.
Security in MSK
Authentication:
o IAM
(via SASL/SCRAM or IAM Access Control)
o TLS
mutual authentication
o Plain
SASL/SCRAM (for legacy)
Authorization:
o Kafka
ACLs (Access Control Lists)
o IAM-based
authorization (for producers/consumers)
Encryption:
o At
rest: AWS KMS (EBS volumes, snapshots)
o In
transit: TLS 1.2+
Networking:
o Always
provisioned into Amazon VPC
o Can
restrict access with Security Groups and PrivateLink.
Data Flow in
MSK
1. Producers publish → Events sent to Kafka topics.
2. Kafka brokers persist → Messages stored in partitions, replicated across brokers.
3. Consumers subscribe → Applications read events in real-time.
4. Downstream sinks → Data streamed into analytics, dashboards, or storage (S3, Redshift, OpenSearch).
Operational
Deep Dive
Storage
& Retention: Messages retained by time (e.g., 7 days) or size per
topic.
Scaling:
o Broker scaling: Increase brokers to
spread partitions.
o Storage scaling: Elastic storage
expansion (without downtime).
Monitoring:
o CloudWatch metrics (throughput, consumer
lag, partition count, ISR).
o Prometheus/Grafana for advanced
monitoring.
Availability:
o Multi-AZ
deployment with replication factor (RF ≥ 3 recommended).
o Automatic
failover of brokers.
Durability:
o Data
replicated across brokers.
o Acks
(acks=all)
ensure strong durability.
Example Use
Cases
1. Event Streaming Platform – Central bus for event-driven architecture.
2. IoT Data Ingestion – Collect millions of device events per second.
3. Log Aggregation – Stream logs into Kafka → process in Flink → sink to S3.
4. Fraud Detection – Real-time anomaly detection on payment streams.
5. Data Lake Ingestion – Stream raw/processed data into S3 + Glue + Athena.
Best
Practices
- Use IAM for access control (simpler and more secure than Kafka ACLs).
- Deploy across 3 AZs with replication factor 3.
- Use producer batching to optimize throughput.
- Monitor consumer lag to detect bottlenecks.
- Enable auto-scaling storage to avoid retention failures.
- Use compression (Snappy, GZIP, ZSTD) to reduce storage & improve throughput.
- Use partition keys carefully to avoid hotspots.
- Enable enhanced monitoring (topic- and partition-level metrics).
Comparison of Amazon
Kinesis Data Streams (KDS) vs. Amazon MSK (Managed
Streaming for Apache Kafka):
Purpose
- Kinesis Data Streams (KDS):
- A fully managed, serverless, AWS-native streaming data service designed for real-time ingestion and processing of events at scale.
- Amazon MSK:
- A fully managed service that makes it easy to run Apache Kafka on AWS. It’s for customers who specifically want Kafka’s ecosystem, APIs, and semantics.
Data Model & Ecosystem
- Kinesis Data Streams:
- Proprietary AWS APIs (PutRecord, GetRecords).
- Integrates tightly with AWS services (Lambda, Firehose, Glue, Redshift,
S3, etc.).
- Simple for AWS-centric workloads.
- MSK (Kafka):
- Open-source Kafka APIs (producers, consumers, Kafka Connect, Kafka Streams, Flink,
etc.).
- Supports Kafka ecosystem tools (Schema Registry, ksqlDB, Debezium, etc.).
- More portable across environments (multi-cloud, on-prem).
Scalability & Throughput
- Kinesis:
- Scales by shards (each shard ~1 MB/s write, 2 MB/s read).
- Can handle millions of records/sec.
- Elastic scaling with On-Demand mode (no shard planning).
- MSK:
- Scales by brokers & partitions.
- Scaling requires careful partition design and possibly
rebalancing.
- Offers more tuning flexibility for performance
optimization.
Latency
- Kinesis:
- Latency typically ~200 ms.
- Near real-time, good for analytics and event-driven
apps.
- MSK:
- Latency ~10s to 100s of ms depending on configuration.
- Supports low-latency streaming pipelines.
Data Retention
- Kinesis:
- Default: 24 hours.
- Extendable up to 365 days (with extended retention).
- MSK:
- Configurable: hours to weeks/months (depends on disk size).
- More flexible for long-term replay.
Ordering &
Delivery
- Kinesis:
- Ordering within a shard only.
- At-least-once delivery.
- MSK:
- Ordering within a partition.
- At-least-once by default, exactly-once supported (idempotent producers + transactional
writes).
Operations & Management
- Kinesis:
- Serverless, no infrastructure management.
- Automatic scaling in On-Demand mode.
- Simple to operate, but limited flexibility.
- MSK:
- AWS manages brokers, ZooKeeper (or KRaft for newer versions), scaling still requires
planning.
- More operational overhead compared to Kinesis.
- Useful for teams already familiar with Kafka.
Pricing Model
- Kinesis:
- Pay per shard-hour + per million PUT payload units +
extended retention cost.
- On-Demand pricing removes shard management but can be
higher for spiky workloads.
- MSK:
- Pay for broker instance hours (EC2-like pricing), storage, and data transfer.
- Often cheaper for sustained high-throughput workloads
if sized properly.
Best Use Cases
- Kinesis Data Streams:
- AWS-native real-time pipelines.
- Serverless event-driven architectures.
- Ingesting IoT, app logs, clickstreams.
- Teams wanting zero ops overhead.
- Amazon MSK:
- Organizations already invested in Kafka.
- Complex event streaming pipelines with Kafka ecosystem
(Kafka Streams, Connectors).
- Hybrid/multi-cloud environments needing Kafka
compatibility.
- Use cases needing exactly-once semantics or longer
retention.
Rule of Thumb:
- If twtech is AWS-native and want simplicity, go
with Kinesis Data Streams.
- If twtech needs Kafka compatibility, advanced streaming features, or portability, go with Amazon MSK.
Key Visual Takeaways
- Kinesis: Fully managed, shard-based, serverless integration with AWS services.
- MSK: Kafka-compatible, partition-based, supports external Kafka ecosystem tools.
No comments:
Post a Comment