Here’s twtech clear comparison
between Amazon EC2 and AWS Lambda... focusing on
their use cases, differences, and when to use one over the other:
Quick Summary:
Feature |
Amazon
EC2 |
AWS
Lambda |
Type. |
Virtual Machine (IaaS) |
Serverless Function (FaaS) |
Provisioning. |
twtech manages instances |
Fully managed by AWS |
Scalability. |
Manual or auto scaling |
Automatically scales |
Pricing Model. |
Pay for uptime (by the
second/minute) |
Pay per request and execution time |
Startup Time. |
Slower (seconds to minutes) |
Very fast (milliseconds) |
Best for. |
Long-running apps, custom
OS/runtime |
Short tasks, event-driven
workloads |
Max Execution Time. |
Unlimited |
15 minutes max per execution |
State Management. |
Can maintain state |
Stateless (must store state
externally) |
Use Case Examples. |
Web servers, databases, containers |
Image resize, API backend, cron
jobs |
When to Use Amazon EC2:
- twtech needs full control over the OS, runtime, and
storage.
- twtech is running legacy applications that can’t be
easily split into functions.
- twtech workload requires long-running processes (e.g.,
web servers, game servers).
- twtech is deploying containers using ECS or Kubernetes
on EC2.
- twtech needs to install custom software or drivers.
When to Use AWS Lambda:
- twtech application is event-driven (e.g., S3
upload → trigger code).
- twtech wants to reduce operational overhead (no server
management).
- twtech has short, lightweight, stateless tasks.
- twtech is building APIs (using Lambda + API Gateway).
- twtech wants automatic, cost-efficient scaling (only pay for usage).
Cost Comparison
(Simplified):
Workload
Type |
Better
Option |
Always-on service. |
EC2 (predictable cost) |
Occasional tasks. |
Lambda (pay-per-use) |
Bursty traffic. |
Lambda (auto-scales) |
Example
Scenario:
- Hosting a web
app:
- Simple backend (low traffic) → Lambda
- High traffic or complex server config → EC2
- Image
processing after S3 upload:
- Use Lambda for real-time, event-driven execution.
No comments:
Post a Comment